Wes Anderson’s Moonrise Kingdom

Posted By yonghow on June 7th, 2012

Wes Anderson’s latest film Moonrise Kingdom doesn’t start its run in Singapore till early August (Arrghh!), but here’s a couple of posters and the trailer to whet your appetite –


I enjoy all of Wes Anderson’s films but my favourite must still be The Royal Tenenbaums ( followed by Fantastic Mr Fox – check out the beautiful making of book here ), which for me is a perfect cinematic amalgamation of great story, character development, cinematography, art direction, costume design, editing and music. Anderson’s storytelling/aesthetic might be an acquired taste, but I really urge you to watch it if you haven’t.

Here are some of Wes Anderson’s other films you might like –

29
Posted in Cinematography, Film

8 Responses to “Wes Anderson’s Moonrise Kingdom”

Li-An

I love his movies too and I’m searching for the “fakes” books cover the girl is reading… If you find them…

Zack

though he does make some visually well made films or whatever, i haven’t really liked one of his films since Bottle Rocket, maybe Rushmore. he gets too into his set piece stuff for me. i feel like he tries too hard to make a Wes Anderson film than making a film and let it breath on it’s own; i think Tarentino does that as well. i just have trouble enjoying them as real movies and not just kitch sometimes.

Li-An

@Zack: well, you can tell the same with Fellini, Truffaut, Godard, Burton, Scorcese, Hitchcock and all important filmmakers. I can understand what you want to say but what is the use to go and see a movie looking the same as the other movies.

Zack

i understand what you’re saying, and i agree, there is just something about his asthetic that irks me.

yonghow

Zack – I think I can see where you’re coming from. In Darjeeling Limited I felt the story was often overwhelmed by the aesthetics. When he does get the combination and balance right though; it’s great. :]

Nielsen

Watching Anderson is like looking at the sides of a lunchbox.

alua

I thought Moonrise Kingdom was good, but as not amazing as I had expected it to be. I think one Cannes reviewer wrote that it was forgotten by the end of the week and I sort of got what s/he meant. It’s entertaining for a few hours and then, it’s over.

The trailer seemed to contain all funny lines, and the rest of the dialogue wasn’t always quite as sharp. I know the film was mocking something but without much knowledge of films in the 60s I’m sure I missed plenty of references that would otherwise have been hilarious.

That said, I thought some of cinematography was splendid (opening shots with the cut-through house that gave a real sense of being “imprisoned” in a space, reflecting Suzy’s feeling of imprisonment) and, hmmm, some true-to-life explorations of the children’s developing relationship (of course, much of their relationship wasn’t meant to be true-to-life but exactly part of the mockery/social commentary).

Okay, I hope I didn’t give anything away!

Li-An

I agree: the trailer is too much explicit. But it’s one of the best movie I saw this year. So rich in content with all the references to children litterature – did you see Oz witch ?

Leave a Reply